Anti-Prohibition, Not Pro-Drug
The War on Drugs failed. A trillion dollars spent, millions imprisoned, and drugs are more deadly than ever. There's a better way.
Let's Be Clear
What This Position Is — And Isn't
❌ We Are NOT Saying:
- Drugs are good
- Drug use is wise
- Addiction isn't destructive
- Everyone should try drugs
- There are no consequences
- Society should encourage drug use
✓ We ARE Saying:
- Prohibition has failed catastrophically
- Adults own their own bodies
- Legal and regulated is safer than illegal and unregulated
- Treatment works better than prison
- The current approach creates more harm than it prevents
- There's a better way
This is not a libertine position. It's a practical position. We don't legalize because drugs are good. We legalize because prohibition is worse.
The War on Drugs: A Trillion-Dollar Failure
Since Nixon declared the War on Drugs in 1971, we have:
And the result? Drugs are more available, more potent, and more deadly than ever.
- Heroin is cheaper and purer than in 1971
- Fentanyl has entered the supply, killing tens of thousands
- Meth is everywhere
- Cocaine never went away
- New synthetic drugs appear faster than we can ban them
The drugs won. We lost. And we destroyed millions of lives in the process — not from drugs, but from prosecuting drugs.
What Prohibition Created
- Massive black markets
- Cartels worth billions
- Gang violence over territory
- Unregulated, dangerous supply
- Fentanyl-laced everything
- No quality control
- 2.3 million Americans in prison
- Millions more with felony records
- Broken families
- Racial disparities in enforcement
- Corrupt police and officials
- Erosion of 4th Amendment rights
What Legalization Enables
- Black markets eliminated
- Cartels defunded
- No turf to fight over
- Regulated, tested supply
- Known dosages, no surprises
- Quality standards enforced
- Prison populations reduced
- No more life-ruining records
- Families kept together
- Equal treatment under law
- Police focus on real crime
- Constitutional rights restored
"Prohibition goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes crimes out of things that are not crimes."
— Abraham Lincoln
The Autonomist Framework: Legal at 25
Here's where we differ from both "drug warriors" and "legalize everything now" libertarians:
Why 25? The human brain isn't fully developed until approximately age 25. The prefrontal cortex — responsible for judgment, impulse control, and long-term thinking — is the last part to mature.
At 25, most people have:
- Completed education or established careers
- Formed serious relationships, often with spouses and children
- Developed stable life patterns worth protecting
- Gained the maturity to make informed decisions about risk
The experimental college years are over. The party phase has passed. Those who still choose to use at 25+ are making an adult decision with adult consequences — and that's their right.
This is actually more restrictive than current alcohol and tobacco laws (age 21). We're not throwing open the doors. We're saying: fully mature adults own their bodies.
What About Alcohol and Tobacco?
We recognize that changing the legal age for alcohol and tobacco to 25 may be politically impossible given their entrenched status. But the principle remains: the later the exposure, the lower the risk of addiction and the more informed the choice.
For currently illegal substances, we have the opportunity to set the right standard from the start. 25 is that standard.
The Framework in Practice
Fully Legal at 25+ (Regulated Retail)
- Marijuana — Already legal in many states. Extend nationally, age 25+.
- Psychedelics (psilocybin, LSD, MDMA) — Low addiction potential, therapeutic applications, adult choice.
Legal at 25+ (Controlled Access)
- Cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, etc. — Available through licensed facilities with:
- Mandatory education on risks before first purchase
- Purity testing and known dosages
- No advertising or promotion
- Consumption facilities available (safe injection sites)
- Immediate access to treatment resources
Always Illegal
- Sale to anyone under 25 — Felony, period.
- Impaired driving — Same as alcohol DUI.
- Public intoxication that endangers others
- Manufacturing without license — Regulated production only.
Why This Destroys the Black Market
Drug dealers can't compete with legal, regulated supply:
- Legal drugs are safer — tested, labeled, no fentanyl surprises
- Legal drugs are convenient — no sketchy meetups, no risk of robbery
- Legal drugs are consistent — same product every time
- Cartels can't undercut legal prices — especially when legal supply is taxed reasonably
When alcohol prohibition ended, the bootleggers disappeared. When drug prohibition ends, the cartels lose their market. You don't defeat black markets with police. You defeat them with competition.
Accountability Remains Absolute
Legalizing substances does not mean legalizing harm. Your autonomy ends where another's begins.
Full Accountability for Harm
- DUI / Impaired Driving: Same penalties as alcohol — or harsher. Kill someone while impaired? Vehicular homicide. Prison.
- Harm to Children: Using around children, providing to minors, endangering minors through impairment — severe penalties, loss of custody.
- Violence While Impaired: No excuse. Full criminal liability. "I was high" is not a defense.
- Workplace Impairment: Employers can maintain drug-free workplace policies. Being high at work is still fireable.
- Neglect: If addiction leads to neglecting dependents, intervention and consequences follow.
- Property Damage: You break it while high, you pay for it.
The principle is simple: what you do to yourself is your business. What you do to others is society's business.
Legalization with accountability is not permissiveness. It's freedom with consequences — the autonomist way.
What About Addiction?
Addiction is real. It destroys lives. Legalization doesn't pretend otherwise.
But here's the truth: addiction exists now, under prohibition. The question isn't whether people will become addicted. They already are. The question is how we respond.
Prohibition Response
- Arrest the addict
- Give them a criminal record
- Make them unemployable
- Destroy family relationships
- Put them in prison with harder criminals
- Release them with nothing
- Watch them relapse and repeat
- Cost: ~$40,000/year per prisoner
Legalization Response
- Treat addiction as health issue
- No criminal record for use
- Maintain employment, housing
- Keep families together
- Provide treatment, not cages
- Support recovery with resources
- Much higher success rates
- Cost: ~$10,000/year for treatment
Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001. The result:
- Drug use did not increase
- Overdose deaths dropped dramatically
- HIV infections among users plummeted
- More people entered treatment
- Money saved on enforcement went to treatment
The evidence is clear. Treatment works. Prison doesn't.
The Autonomist Drug Policy Principles
- Adults own their bodies. At 25+, with a fully developed brain, what you choose to put in your body is your decision. Government doesn't own you.
- Prohibition has failed. A trillion dollars, millions of prisoners, and drugs are more available and deadly than ever. It's time to try something that works.
- Legal is safer than illegal. Regulated supply means tested products, known doses, no fentanyl surprises. People will use drugs regardless; legal use is safer use.
- 25 is the threshold. The brain must be fully developed. College experimentation is over. Those who choose at 25+ are making adult decisions.
- Black markets die through competition. Legal supply destroys illegal supply. Cartels can't compete with licensed retailers. The violence ends when the profit ends.
- Treatment, not cages. Addiction is a health issue. We treat health issues with medicine, therapy, and support — not prison cells.
- Accountability is absolute. Harm someone while impaired? Full consequences. Your right to use ends where someone else's safety begins.
- Protect children fiercely. Sale to under-25 is a felony. No exceptions. No excuses. Legal markets check ID; drug dealers don't.
The Hard Question
Some will ask: "Are you really saying heroin should be legal?"
Yes. For adults 25 and older, through regulated channels, with full information about risks, with treatment available on demand.
Because the alternative — what we have now — is worse:
- Heroin cut with fentanyl, killing users who don't know what they're taking
- Addicts afraid to seek help because they'll be arrested
- Billions flowing to cartels instead of treatment
- Families destroyed by incarceration, not just addiction
- An ever-growing prison population with no reduction in use
We're not pro-heroin. We're anti-prohibition. There's a difference.
It's your life. It's your body.
If you're 25, fully informed, and choose to use — that's your right.
If you harm someone else — that's your crime.
Freedom with consequences. The autonomist way.